Marshall & Stevens excels at providing accurate, timely, and supportable valuations for a wide range of debt instruments.
Many people cannot resist a good ghost story. However, while a good ghost story is harmless, ghost assets are not. The term “ghost assets” refers to physical assets that are accounted for on a company’s fixed asset listing (“FAL”), but that do not physically exist at the manufacturing plant or other locations. FAL discrepancies arise for a variety of reasons, including the sale, decommission or cannibalization of machinery, equipment, and other assets. In capital-intensive industries such as manufacturing and wholesale distribution, there is great potential for such discrepancies, which can lead to either an over- or under-reporting of assets.
The Benefits of Eliminating Ghost Assets:
By conducting periodic appraisals of their assets, which includes physical counts of assets, manufacturers and distributors may be able to reduce and/or eliminate their ghost assets. Potential benefits of an appraisal include:
- Possible reduction in personal property taxes in applicable taxing jurisdictions;
- Adequate insurance coverage of the assets;
- Streamlined and cost-effective annual updates;
- Accurate accounting of assets for financial reporting, and;
- Improved budgeting for future capital expenditures.
The Haunting
Manufacturers and wholesale distribution companies often allow themselves to be unwittingly haunted by ghost assets in a few ways. For example, companies could be paying personal property taxes on nonexistent property. There is also the potential for undervaluing — and therefore underinsuring — physical assets. Companies making an acquisition may be unpleasantly surprised to find that the acquired assets were miscounted or did not exist, and the fair market value was therefore miscalculated. Since fixed assets often represent the largest items on a manufacturer’s or distributor’s balance sheet, inaccurate accounting can lead to significant financial reporting misstatements, which can damage management’s credibility with shareholders, lenders, and suppliers.
Provided below are several scenarios where an appraisal would be beneficial:
Acquisitions – Purchase Price Allocations: In a business combination there may be some assets that are duplicated, disposed of, cannibalized for extra parts or may have been retired or upgraded. As a result, this can affect the fair value of the assets. Problems can occur when the lists of assets are initially merged. The buyer can be certain that the assets purchased exist by having an appraiser conduct a physical count of the assets and prepare an appraisal that accurately reflects the duplicated, disposed, retired, and upgraded assets.
Insurance: Appraisals are required to establish a replacement cost new (“RCN”) for insurance coverage to indemnify the insured against loss. Thus, the insurable value of assets is obviously of concern to owners, lessors, lessees, insurers, agents, and brokers. If a manufacturer or distributor does not perform a routine inventory of its assets to remove ghost assets from its FAL, it runs the risk of insuring assets that do not exist, resulting in unnecessarily high insurance premiums. Conversely, if significant upgrades to a production line have been performed and not properly accounted for, the company could be underinsuring its assets and increasing its exposure. Consideration should be given to the level of exposure related to customized assets such as automated distribution centers, filling machines in bottling plants, etc. These assets are typically designed and built for a specific company for a specific purpose. By properly identifying and valuing these customized assets, a company can mitigate its level of exposure and be certain that its insurance company is aware of the one-of-a-kind nature of the assets and that appropriate measures have been taken to mitigate risk.
Personal Property Tax: Many states levy personal property taxes on machinery and equipment. Typically, these taxes are levied based on “self-reporting,” with the company providing a copy of its FAL to the assessor, who then calculates the personal property tax liability. Without an accurate inventory, ghost assets can linger on the FAL, resulting in the company paying personal property taxes on assets that no longer exist. As illustrated in the table below, the company realized a tax savings of $180,000 in the first year following the appraisal. Some states allow business owners to amend their personal property taxes for up to three years, so the savings can be significant.
Income Tax: One of the most common income tax-related reasons for an appraisal is for the purchase price allocation in a transaction (as per the IRS Asset Acquisition Statement Under Form 10601). The IRS’s standard of value is fair market value; therefore, the removal of ghost assets results in more accurate calculations of fair market value, with the purchase price being allocated to the assets that physically exist. As shown in Table 1 below, ghost assets totaling $7,000,000 were identified and removed from the fair market value allocation. Using an estimated 38% federal tax rate, the seller could realize a potential savings of $2,660,000 ($7,000,000 x .38). This would cause a reallocation of purchase price and potentially prompt the buyer to rethink the consideration paid.
Condemnation (Eminent Domain): When a public agency needs to acquire private property for conversion to public use, it exercises the power of eminent domain. If the property in question is industrial or commercial in character, it probably contains a considerable amount of machinery and equipment that would be costly to relocate. By having a professional appraisal performed, a company can better demonstrate its losses attributed to equipment that is either difficult to remove or relocate, which aids in its negotiations for just compensation.
How the Appraisal Process Works
Marshall & Stevens recommends having appraisals performed by an accredited appraiser (see sidebar) because, in addition to offering independence and objectivity, they possess significant expertise in valuing machinery and equipment. When conducting an appraisal, an appraiser typically:
- Identifies assets that do not physically exist but are recorded in the FAL as well as assets that physically exist but are not recorded in the FAL
- Considers the three approaches to value: 1) cost, 2) sales comparison, and 3) income;
- Corrects the classification of assets as necessary;
- Calculates the reproduction / replacement cost new;
- Determines the normal useful lives of assets;
- Calculates physical deterioration;
- Identifies and develops functional and economic obsolescence penalties (if applicable); and
- Performs research in the secondary market of comparable assets (if applicable).
In selecting an appraiser, manufacturers and distributors should make sure that the appraiser holds a designation in good standing with one or more of the following organizations:
|
The appraisal process typically involves four steps:
At the outset of an appraisal, an appraiser will request a copy of the current FAL. The appraiser then evaluates the FAL with the purpose of identifying inconsistencies such as assets that may have been disposed, retired, sold or transferred but still appear on the FAL and therefore are reported in financial statements. These inconsistencies are investigated during the on-site visit when a physical inventory is carried out. Following the on-site visit, the appraiser updates the FAL, removing assets that do not physically exist and adding those that were not reported. Finally, the appraiser calculates the fair market value, providing the business owner with a clean and final FAL.
How Marshall & Stevens can help with Ghost Assets
Our Transaction Opinion team collaborates with our internal multi-disciplinary professionals to provide the value analyses and fresh independent opinions to fiduciaries, financing sources and investors for public and private company transactions.
Purchase Price Allocation
Marshall & Stevens is a preferred source for purchase price allocation analyses because of our approach to these assignments and the fact we have multiple valuation disciplines in-house.
Business Valuation
Whether for purchase, sale, investment, gifting, recapitalization, or equity/option grants, establishing an understanding of value is crucial for decision makers.
Machinery and Equipment
Our Machinery and Equipment valuation professionals spend the time necessary to provide reliable analyses.
The Marshall & Stevens Difference
Marshall & Stevens provides Fairness and Solvency Opinions, valuation analyses, investigative accounting, and expert witness services to assist public and private clients with their important transactions and litigation matters.
- 11 offices
- over 200 employees
- 26 Unique Professional Certifications
- 8 firms acquired since 2023
- 93 years (founded 1932)
- over 55 staff with tenure of 9+ years
Client Highlights
Here are a few client success stories from
Finance, Refinance, Recapitalization Contacts at Marshall & Stevens
Background
J. Fernando Sosa is a Managing Director in the Energy & Infrastructure Practice of Marshall & Stevens Incorporated. He is co-leader of its Chicago E&I region and oversees the execution of valuation consulting services to the firm’s public and privately held clients.
Mr. Sosa specializes in valuation and cost estimates of tangible assets and integrated projects/facilities both domestic and international. Independent valuation consulting and opinions are provided for buy/sell consideration, mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, and financings, financial reporting, tax reporting, bankruptcy/restructuring, feasibility, and matters of dispute including litigation support. He is fluent in Spanish and has performed appraisals for clients throughout the United States and for multinational clients in England, Spain, México, Panamá, Dominican Republic, Chile, El Salvador, Colombia, and Puerto Rico.
Mr. Sosa is responsible for the valuation of residential, commercial and industrial, community, distributed generation, and utility scale solar electric generation projects and portfolios, wind electric generation projects, stand-alone energy storage, microgrids, and renewable natural gas projects. He works with our Financial Valuation Practice on financial reporting analyses. He leads the valuation of facilities to qualify for repowering (“80/20 test”).
Tax reporting assignments are most commonly provided for compliance with Internal Revenue Code Sections 861, 382, and 704(c), cost segregation (MACRS) and personal property tax. Financial reporting assignment including purchase price allocations (ASC 805), impairment testing (ASC 350 and 360), and fresh start accounting (ASC 852).
Mr. Sosa has served clients in a variety of industries including aviation, construction, energy generation, entertainment, food processing, hospitality, manufacturing, medical imaging, plastic injection molding, retail, semiconductor, steel reprocessing, transportation, waste collection and recycle, water/wastewater treatment plants, and other infrastructure projects.
Prior to rejoining Marshall & Stevens, Mr. Sosa served in senior roles at Cushman & Wakefield, CohnReznick, and American Appraisal Associates. He started his valuation career in American Appraisal’s Public Accounting Service Group. He was employed by Marshall & Stevens from 2002-2005.
An Accredited Senior Appraiser (ASA) in Machinery & Technical Specialties with the American Society of Appraisers, Mr. Sosa currently serves as Chair of Membership for the International American Society of Appraisers and has served in leadership roles for the Chicago chapter of the American Society of Appraisers including chapter President in 2022-2023. He is a Member of the Royal Institution of Charted Surveyors (MRICS).
Professional Highlights
.collapsible { background-color: #d9eafc; color: black; cursor: pointer; padding: 10px; width: 100%; border: none; text-align: left; outline: none; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; } .active, .collapsible:hover { background-color: #d9eafc; } .content1 { padding: 0 18px; display: visible; overflow: hidden; background-color: #fff; } var coll = document.getElementsByClassName("collapsible"); var i; for (i = 0; i < coll.length; i++) { coll[i].addEventListener("click", function() { this.classList.toggle("active"); var content = this.nextElementSibling; if (content.style.display === "block") { content.style.display = "none"; } else { content.style.display = "block"; } }); }- Member, American Society of Appraisers
- Chair of Membership Committee, International American Society of Appraisers, present
- President, American Society of Appraisers Chicago Chapter, 2022-2023
- Member, Royal Institution of Charted Surveyors
- Marshall & Stevens, Inc.
September 2023-present
‣ Managing Director, Energy & Infrastructure, 2024-present
‣ Director, 2023-2024 - Cushman & Wakefield
Director, 2018-2023 - CohnReznick LLP
Senior Manager, 2013-2018 - Alpha Power
Vice President, 2009-2013 - MR Valuation Consulting, LLC
Manager, 2007-2013 - American Appraisal Associates
Manager, 2006-2007 - Deloitte Financial Advisory Services
Senior Associate, 2005-2006 - Marshall & Stevens, Inc.
Senior Consultant, 2003-2005
Background
Anthony Festa, ASA, is a Managing Director in the New York Office’s Machinery & Equipment Practice of Marshall & Stevens Incorporated. Mr. Festa’s responsibilities include overseeing the delivery of valuation services to the Firm’s machinery and equipment valuation clients.
Mr. Festa leads asset valuations for buy/sell consideration, financing, insurance, tax reporting, and financial reporting purposes including purchase price allocations (ASC 805), impairment testing (ASC 350 and ASC 360), and Internal Revenue Code Sections 861, 382, and 704(c). Financing engagements include valuations for leasing and other structure finance transactions and bankruptcy/reorganization including fresh-start accounting.
Mr. Festa has served clients in a wide variety of industries including, but not limited to: automotive, aerospace and defense, broadcast and communications, chemicals, entertainment, financial services, food production, healthcare, hospitality, mining and milling, pharmaceutical, pulp and paper, restaurants, semiconductor, telecommunications, textiles, water and other infrastructure projects.
Specific to the water infrastructure industry, he has performed valuations for several Texas-based investor-owned water and wastewater plants for a transaction, a New Jersey township for a transaction, and a New Hampshire wastewater plant for financing purposes. He is an associate member of the National Association of Water Companies (NAWC) and has spoken at numerous professional conferences on the valuation of water utilities including the NAWC Water Summit in 2019.
He is an Accredited Senior Appraiser (ASA) in Machinery & Technical Specialties with the American Society of Appraisers. He has served in multiple leadership roles for New York City chapter of the American Society of Appraisers including President of the chapter in 2010-2011.
Professional Highlights
.collapsible { background-color: #d9eafc; color: black; cursor: pointer; padding: 10px; width: 100%; border: none; text-align: left; outline: none; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; } .active, .collapsible:hover { background-color: #d9eafc; } .content1 { padding: 0 18px; display: visible; overflow: hidden; background-color: #fff; } var coll = document.getElementsByClassName("collapsible"); var i; for (i = 0; i < coll.length; i++) { coll[i].addEventListener("click", function() { this.classList.toggle("active"); var content = this.nextElementSibling; if (content.style.display === "block") { content.style.display = "none"; } else { content.style.display = "block"; } }); }- Associate Member, National Association of Water Companies (NAWC)
- Member, American Society of Appraisers, New York Chapter
- President, 2010-2011
- Marshall & Stevens, Inc.
September 2022-present
‣ Managing Director, National Practice Leader - Machinery & Equipment, 2023-present
‣ Director, 2022-2023 - Cushman & Wakefield
Director, 2018-2022 - Alvarez & Marshal
Senior Director, 2012-2018 - American Appraisal Associates
Director, 2005-2012 - Ernst & Young
Manager, 1997-2005 - Lehman Brothers
Tax Accounting Intern, 1996-1997
- Valuing Specific Assets in Divorce, contributing author, first published by Aspen Publishers in 2000, updated in 2009 and 2013
- Valuation Strategies in Divorce, fourth edition (contributing author), Aspen Publishers, 2009
- December 2007, co-presenter in Greensboro, North Carolina to the North Carolina Department of Revenue on the “Valuation of Idle Equipment”
- February & March 2016, presenter in Washington, DC and Augusta, Georgia to the National Association of Regulated Utilities Commissioners on the “Valuation of Water Utilities”
- August 2016 and 2018, presenter in Denver, Colorado and Washington DC, respectively, to the Water Finance Conference on the “Valuation of Water Utilities”
- July 2018, co-presenter in Toronto, Canada to the American Society of Civil Engineers on the “Valuation of Water Utilities”
- October 2019, panelist in Nashville, TN at the National Association of Water Companies’ 2019 Water Summit on “Fair Market Value Legislation”
- Podcast interview via Soundcloud – Assessing and Valuing Water Systems
- ASA NYC chapter presentations including “M&E Valuation Concepts under ASC 360,” and “M&E Financial Reporting Audit Issues”