The valuation of intangible assets is performed for buy/sell/lease consideration, collateral lending/financing, financial reporting, tax reporting, or dispute purposes. As indicated above, there are two general categories of intangible assets:
Identifiable intangible assets can be sold and licensed separately from the business enterprise that owns them. Examples of identifiable intangible assets are customer relationships, trademarks and tradenames, software, copyrights, formulas, patents, goodwill, URLs, and domain names. Businesses are built on assets such as the name of a famous actor or chef, a computer operating system (software), a brand name for shoes or purses, a pharmaceutical formula, a patent for a medical device.
Example 1 – Trademarks and Tradenames: What does the company or person’s name represent to you: quality, value, expected result, sophistication, exclusivity, taste, health? You can choose to purchase a substitute for the named product, but you select the specific product because you enjoy and/or trust it. What additional value does that tradename bring to the product? How much more can the seller charge for this product than for competing products just by having the name you look for stamped on the box. Companies purchase and license trade names to brand or rebrand their products, businesses, and services rather than spending the time and money to build up their own trade name. Trademarks and tradenames are bought, sold, and licensed.
Example 2 – Patents: Patents have value because they protect, or are intended to protect, the product’s originator from copy and sale by others. When patents for successful products expire, generic and other substitutes arrive on the market to take market share. Patents are regularly bought. sold, and licensed.
A business’ skilled or trained workforce, management team, and know-how may be desired by an investor or competing business, but these intangible assets are not easily separable from the business enterprise itself. The value of these assets can be additive to the overall value of the business, even providing a competitive advantage to comparable businesses, but one would have to purchase the business enterprise itself to gain value from these intangible assets.
The valuation of businesses and assets rely on the application of three generally accepted approaches to value: market approach, cost approach, and income approach. We consider these same approaches when valuing identifiable intangible assets:
Market Approach: The market approach relies on the comparability of the subject asset to similar assets that have sold. This exercise works well for a large percentage of physical assets (machinery, equipment, vehicles, real estate), but it is not easily applied to intangible assets. Transaction data for sales of intangible asset sales for providing a similar function and serving a similar market can be challenging.
Cost Approach: The historical cost incurred developing the asset does not typically represent the value someone would pay to purchase or relate to the rate one would license the asset. However, a replacement cost approach is sometimes pursued to provide an indication of value – especially for intangibles such as software and assembled workforce. In this approach, a valuation professional builds a theoretical cost to create a new replacement for the subject asset today, and then may adjust for obsolescence.
Income Approach: The value of intangible assets is most often derived with the application of one or more income approach methods:
The valuation of intangible assets requires not just quantitative skills, but also qualitative analysis and judgement from an experienced independent professional.
For more information, please contact one of the professionals below:
Our Intangible Asset Valuation team collaborates with our internal multi-disciplinary professionals to provide the value analyses and fresh independent opinions to fiduciaries, financing sources and investors for public and private company transactions.
Marshall & Stevens meets the IRS’ “Qualified Appraiser” standard, valuing real estate, businesses, intangible assets, and equipment for estate and gift tax reporting purposes.
Real estate should be looked at strategically for potential beneficial tax reporting, financial reporting, depreciation including cost segregation and bonus depreciation, financing including sale leaseback, etc.
The fair market value of acquired real estate is often much higher than the seller’s capitalized basis and the allocation between land (not depreciable) and improvements (depreciable) is often different than what the assessor has determined.
For financial reporting, the value of acquired real estate needs to be allocated to land, building and improvements, and intangible assets.
Marshall & Stevens provides Fairness and Solvency Opinions, valuation analyses, investigative accounting, and expert witness services to assist public and private clients with their important transactions and litigation matters.
Here are a few client success stories from public and private companies we’ve worked with
